Subject: Documentation systems
Rene. E. Blekman <r.blekman [at] rijksmuseum__nl> writes >Here in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam we are working on a project >concerning the centralisation of all documentation, including that >of restoration, condition and research. We are still in the phase of >building up our expertise. I am looking for models in which a fully >integrated system is operational for all kinds of documentation e.g. >reports, photo's, scientific data, x-ray, microscopic data etc. > >We are using Adlib for CMS. Also different applications are used for >several purposes. The database project at the Philadelphia Museum of Art is described below, with the hope that this information may be useful to others engaged in trying to improve digital record-keeping for conservation. As with most large institutions, our existing conservation records were in many formats and our first challenge was to bring them together in a single system. Over the past eight years or so, we have developed a program for conservation record-keeping (the Conservation Tracker System) that may be able to serve the larger conservation community. We are in the process of making short term refinements (to be completed within 4 to 6 months). These will be followed shortly thereafter by reprogramming the database with open source code to make it more broadly accessible. The system presently allows conservators to enter, store, search, and retrieve conservation records and documentary photography. It extracts key information about an object (accession number, artist, title, date) from our collection information system, TMS (it could connect to any other). We focused on creating a user-friendly interface for entering information and on printing reports that look like typical conservation text documents. The system incorporates word processing features (via MS Word), and allows image viewing and editing (images stored on a separate server and accessible through the database; editing for diagrams, etc., via Adobe Photoshop). Features include screens for entering and printing reports (examinations, treatments, loan exams) and an analytical report summary, with an abstract field to summarize report contents. A conservation history record is generated for each object and includes a list of conservation reports with abstracts, as well as any special conditions or handling requirements. There is an in/out log, a photography log and an analytical request screen. Administrative functions include the ability to assign user privilege level (add/edit, view only or access denied), distribute new reports via email, and attach existing documents in word processing format (retaining the original format) . Searches include simple searches by accession number, advanced searches on information in almost any field with the ability to filter by the original record source, and text searches in attached documents. Pick lists are used wherever possible for consistency and to facilitate future searches. The "signed" feature locks a completed document, essentially archiving it. Conventions developed for labeling digital images allow easy identification of date, view, treatment stage, etc. Other features include a " duplicate function" that copies information from an existing report and pastes it into a new one. We launched the system almost two years ago. It presently contains over 21,000 text records, which include reports created in the Tracker, documents attached in word processing format, records mapped from our previous FileMaker Pro database, and records mapped from previous collection surveys. The image server now holds 27,000 conservation images. We think that the design changes and additional features currently underway for the database will greatly extend its usefulness. These include: * refining the system architecture so that new screens and functions can be added by in-house staff without requiring customized programming; * allowing registrars and curators to enter work requests; * attaching notes scanned from conservation files to the database * exporting information from Tracker into TMS for general viewing by museum staff (such as a history of past conservation reports with abstracts for each object, and notes about fragility or special handling requirements). * Developing a customizable survey screen. Please fell free to contact us, Nancy Ash <nash<-a t->philamuseum< . >org> and Andrew Lins <alins<-a t->philamuseum< . >org> with any questions or thoughts you might have. *** Conservation DistList Instance 21:37 Distributed: Friday, January 4, 2008 Message Id: cdl-21-37-002 ***Received on Thursday, 3 January, 2008