Subject: ALUPV 250 or PP250L as a protective backing for paintings
**** Moderator's comments: Please respond directly to the author. ALUPV 250, otherwise known as PP250L, and sold in the UK under the latter by Protective Packaging Ltd in Sale, Cheshire, is increasingly being used in paintings conservation, both institutionally and privately, as a protective thermal insulation backing for paintings hung in uncontrolled and potentially adverse environments. However, as far as I am aware, this use appears to have crept in without any notable testing or peer review publication as to its efficacy as a 'conservation grade' material. I understand it was developed in the packaging industry primarily for protection of sensitive electronics and for food where temperature fluctuations may be an issue. Its advantages in preventive paintings conservation are its notable insulation performance and ease to fix and remove quickly with no invasive or permanent intervention. It can be stapled or taped to the reverse of a frame and can accommodate uneven and difficult shapes and surfaces. ALUPV 250 /PP250L is a flexible, fairly thick and robust triple laminate of low density polythene (LDPE), aluminium foil and a white Polyester flock lining for insulation on the inner face. Communications with Protective Packaging state that "The LDPE, which is used as a sealing layer when manufacturing bags from this material, covers the outside of the aluminium. The aluminium is sandwiched between Polyester and LDPE. The adhesive used is a solvent based adhesive which is specially formulated for the lamination process. We would expect the foil to be stable for up to 20 years providing it is kept between -40 and +80 deg. C and of course it must be maintained in good condition." The effect of sunlight/UV on the polythene would dramatically decrease its longevity, but this should not be a problem when face-in to a wall on the back of a painting. Current thoughts are that a 20 year life is conservative, but that when degradation does occur it will be the polythene first and that at worst this might produce harmless paraffin derivatives. The technical data states: Construction 90 g/m2 Polyester Non Woven; 45 g/m2 LDPE Coating; 12 micron Aluminium Foil (32 g/m2); 3 g/m2 Adhesive; 73 g/m2 LDPE Film Technical Values / Performance Total Weight (g/m2) approximately 243 gsm EN 22 286; Tensile Strength MD 250 N/50 mm ISO 527-3; CD 150 N/50 mm ISO 527-3; Tear Strength MD 67N DIN 53 363; CD 93N DIN 53 363; Elongation MD 50% ISO 527-3; CD 70% ISO 527-3; Sealing Conditions 200 deg. C / 2 bar / 2 secs; Water Vapour Permeability <0.04gms / m2 / 24hrs; Temperature Range -40 deg. C to + 80 deg. C Classification MIL-PRF-131 J Class 1; DEF STAN 81-75-2 Type 1; TL 8135-0003 Application Material has a non-woven polyester for mechanical and thermal protection and is recommended for use on large items where a robust liner is required. This information is given in good faith but must not be regarded as forming a specification. An early instance of its use with paintings has been at the Tate (Rica Jones) where it has been used from time to time since 1995 as a short term, protective, lightweight, flexible backboard for loan-in paintings and for paintings hung in difficult environments (including one particular sea facing wall at Tate St Ives). It is also used at the V&A (Nicola Costaras) for backing large paintings where a backboard would be impractical, either too heavy or too bulky, for instance where large oil on canvas paintings are being inserted into niches in the fabric of a building or against an outside wall. I have also been in communication with Hugh Phibbs of the National Gallery of Art Washington DC who uses a version of it (again mostly for short term use for loans in and out), Mitsubishi PE/AL/PE/PET, which is a quadruple laminate of polythene, aluminium foil, polythene and polyester film. The polythene is used as the thermoplastic adhesive (i.e. no additional adhesive is required). He also uses a similar Marvelseal 360 with polyamide outer layer or 1311 with a cotton outer layer, and another called RIBS MVTR. Hugh has carried out a considerable amount of testing and research in connection with temporary micro-climate chambers on which he and Mervin Richard have published, but we know of no specific publication about this material and its longevity as yet. Does anyone have any direct experience of this product or similar alternatives? Has anyone carried out tests relating to its use in the conservation profession and particularly its longevity as a longer term solution for the protective backing of paintings in say, for example, a church environment? Is anyone intending to publish any related conservation data? I would be grateful for any comments, general or otherwise. Kiffy Stainer-Hutchins Kiffy Stainer Hutchins and Co Conservation and Restoration of Fine Paintings and Associated Works Houghton Conservation Studios Houghton Norfolk PE31 6TY United Kingdom +44 1485 528 667 *** Conservation DistList Instance 23:5 Distributed: Thursday, June 11, 2009 Message Id: cdl-23-5-018 ***Received on Wednesday, 10 June, 2009