Subject: Survey on Flugger
The Facts on Flugger Acrylic Putty: A study on the properties of a commercial filler I am a second year student in the Master of Art Conservation Program at Queen's University. I am undertaking a research project that consists of assessing the use of Flugger Acrylic Putty as an infill material in conservation. By comparing the putty to Polycell's Fine Surface Polyfilla through experimentation, I hope to evaluate the putty's suitability as a substrate for paint and the effect of ageing on its physical and chemical properties. As part of my research, I am trying to gain a better understanding of how conservators use the putty and what they think of it. I hope to achieve this through the following survey. I will be grateful for any insights and feedback from conservators who have experience with the putty. Please provide your contact details: Name: Email: Work setting (governmental, institutional, private, other): Country: 1. What type of materials have you used Flugger Acrylic Putty on? 2. On a scale of one to four (1=poor, 4=excellent) how would you rate the putty's: i) applicability ii) carveability iii) sandability iv) ease of being inpainted Comments: 3. Would you choose Flugger Acrylic Putty over another infill material? Why or why not? 4. Have you been able to inspect a Flugger Acrylic Putty infill after several years' time? If so, what was the state of the infill? 5. Do you have any concerns about using Flugger Acrylic Putty? Thank you for your time and willingness to share your experience with Flugger Acrylic Putty. Ida Pohoriljakova, M.A.C. Candidate Master of Art Conservation Program Queen's University 15 Bader Lane Kingston, Ontario Canada K7L 3N6 *** Conservation DistList Instance 23:18 Distributed: Friday, November 20, 2009 Message Id: cdl-23-18-015 ***Received on Sunday, 15 November, 2009