[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
arsclist Important Issue for all Arsckist members - Saving Internet Online Radio
The following article may also be found by going to:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/05/12/PK198486.DTL
-----------------------------------------------------
Online radio in peril
By Neva Chonin/San Francisco Chronicle
May Day had a special meaning for online music fans this year, as
hundreds of
online radio outlets stopped the music and observed a "day of silence"
to
call attention to a proposed law that might shut them down forever.
Independent Internet radio could become history on May 21 if the Library
of
Congress accepts its Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel's
recommendations
for radio royalty rates. A little background: In 1998, Congress passed
the
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which established that
Internet-only
Webcasters must pay an additional "performance royalty" for playing
copyrighted music. But the royalty rate of 14 cents per song, per
listener (7
cents per song for commercial radio station simulcasts and 2 cents per
song
for noncommercial radio simulcasts), is far more than most Webcasters
and
community- based radio stations can afford, and royalties would be
retroactive from October 1998.
Drafted at the height of music industry paranoia over the Internet, the
law
maintains that streamed Webcasts offer "perfect" digital copies that
could
cut into CD sales. But as anyone who has ever listened to online radio
will
agree, streamed sound is nowhere near "perfect" enough for bootlegging.
Hearing streaming music doesn't encourage theft -- like broadcast radio,
it
turns listeners on to new music and inspires them to go out and buy the
real
thing.
"There's a significant difference between downloading and file sharing
piracy
and independent Webcasters who intend to pay for the use of the
copyright,"
points out John Jeffrey, general counsel for Live365 (www.live365.com).
"But
we've ended up with a royalties rate that doesn't reflect the way
similar
copyrights are treated around the world."
With billions in cash flow, conglomerates such as AOL and Yahoo aren't
the
ones in peril if the copyright panel recommendations are made law. It's
the
Internet-only Webcasters who will be bankrupted and vanish. It's the
smaller,
community-based stations like KUSF -- whose simulcasts from www.kusf.org
are
on hiatus since its Web host panicked over the copyright panel's report
and
shut down -- that will be silenced and their diverse programming that
will be
lost.
"We need the Internet -- there are listeners in other parts of the
country
and the world who want to listen to us," says KUSF DJ Terror Bull Ted.
"They're trying to get small people like us to fork over cash that we
can't
afford."
Internet radio has been a boon to everyone, from jazz and world music
fans to
classical aficionados and news buffs. It offers programming unbounded by
geography, corporate restrictions, annoying commercials and the whims of
popular taste. Silencing the small-scale, low-budget mavericks who make
this
possible would be more than unjust. It would be flat-out tragic.
What can Internet radio fans do? Call their senators and Congress
people, for
one thing. For another, visit the Save Internet Radio site at
www.saveinternetradio.org for more suggestions and background
information on
the digital copyright act.
-
For subscription instructions, see the ARSC home page
http://www.arsc-audio.org/arsclist.html
Copyright of individual posting is owned by the author of the posting and
permission to re-transmit or publish a post must be secured
from the author of the post.