[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ARSCLIST] CHE: Record Industry Has No Plan to Seek Names of Students Trading Copyrighted Songs
Record Industry Has No Plan to Seek Names of Students Trading
Copyrighted Songs
The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3.2.14
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i23/23a03601.htm
By ANDREA L. FOSTER
In a case that campus-network administrators followed
closely, the recording industry won an important legal victory
last month that will help record companies ferret out music
fans who illegally trade copyrighted material. But an industry
official says the victory doesn't mean that companies will
start demanding the names of college students who pass around
song files -- at least not yet.
"We have no current plans to do that, but that doesn't mean we
wouldn't in the future," says Cary H. Sherman, president and
general counsel of the Recording Industry Association of
America. "I can't rule it out."
The court case pitted the trade association against Verizon
Communications, which had declined to turn over the name of a
Verizon customer who had allegedly downloaded nearly 600 songs
using KaZaA, a popular file-sharing system. The association
sued to learn the customer's name, arguing that the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act required Verizon to reveal it.
College Rumors
Judge John D. Bates, of the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia, sided with the association, ruling that
the law permits a copyright owner to send a subpoena ordering
a service provider to reveal information about a subscriber.
The subpoena doesn't require a judge's permission.
The ruling prompted a flurry of speculation among college
administrators about whether the recording-industry group
would regularly present subpoenas to colleges demanding that
they identify students who swap music online.
Mr. Sherman says the association has not presented subpoenas
to colleges asking for the identities of students who share
music online. When copyright owners complain to colleges about
individuals who use campus networks to share movies or music
illegally, the owners usually refer to alleged violators by
the numerical Internet address of each user's computer.
Colleges receive hundreds of such complaints each month.
But because the recording-industry group communicates
periodically with college administrators about copyright
infringement, it hasn't felt the need to demand that colleges
hand over the names of copyright violators, Mr. Sherman says.
'In Good Faith'
"We are operating in good faith together to try to address the
problem in a very productive manner. We would hope not to have
to be going down the road we had to go down with Verizon," Mr.
Sherman says.
Nonetheless, he says he believes that colleges qualify as
Internet-service providers under the digital copyright law,
and that as a result, the institutions can be subpoenaed to
hand over the names of infringing students.
That point is not lost on Sheldon E. Steinbach, general
counsel of the American Council on Education. If the court
decision is upheld, he says, "the message to students will be
clear: We can find you, and you can be held personally liable
for copyright infringement."
Verizon last month asked Judge Bates to halt the ruling while
it appeals the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit.
At least one college administrator speculates that the
recording industry would be reluctant to pursue colleges.
Tracy B. Mitrano, director of the program in computer policy
and law at Cornell University, says colleges would
vociferously assert their tradition of upholding academic
freedom, free speech, and fair use if the record companies
asked for students' identities.
"If I were in the entertainment industry and looking to
enforce" the digital copyright law, she says, "I would more
likely want to pursue a commercial Internet-service provider,
and perhaps one that has moved into broadband, because that's
where this activity is moving."