[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] New CD Report NIST
> Are there studies reporting results using the procedure/standard?
I don't know, but I'm having a grand time looking. Here is a document published
by the Library of Congress in 2003. "LONGEVITY OF CD MEDIA: RESEARCH AT THE
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS" It's supposed to be in PDF format, but I can't seem to
access that version. Maybe somebody at LOC can point the way. In the
meantime, I found an HTML version by following this link:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:dVmv2WvjfCYJ:www.loc.gov/preserv/study%2520of%2520CD%2520longevity.pdf+compact+disc+life+expectancy
--
Rick Taylor
Graduate Research Assistant
DLSD - Audio Digitization Lab
University of Texas Libraries
The University of Texas at Austin
PCL 3.106 | Mail Code S5471 | PO Box P
Austin, TX 78712
Phone: 512-495-4439
rtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | www.lib.utexas.edu
Quoting Mike Richter <mrichter@xxxxxxx>:
> At 10:41 AM 12/14/2004 -0600, Rick Taylor wrote:
> >Sorry - I wasn't paying attention. This is the one I meant to grab:
> >"AES38-2000 AES standard for audio preservation and restoration -- Life
> >expectancy of information stored in recordable compact disc systems --
> Method
> >for estimating, based on effects of temperature and relative humidity."
> >
> >Same page (which includes another study from 1997 re: CD-ROMS):
> >http://www.aes.org/standards/b_pub/aes-standards-in-print.cfm
>
> Again, thank you. Scanning this one is more difficult, but leads to the
> following:
> 1. No conclusions are drawn
> 2. The properties of the tested discs are not given
> 3. For those discs, accelerated life tests as defined here seem appropriate
>
> It is a substantial stretch - though again there is no other guideline - to
> assume that 3. above applies to a specific modern medium. I interpret the
> document as defining a test procedure by which a candidate medium can be
> measured. Are there studies reporting results using the procedure/standard?
> Or am I misreading the document and its purpose?
>
> Mike
> --
> mrichter@xxxxxxx
> http://www.mrichter.com/
>