[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ARSCLIST] cataloging question
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ARSCLIST] cataloging question
- From: Brandon Burke <thejosephboys@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:44:41 -0800
- Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <arsclist@loc.gov>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FwHvXcD2vUPXlImqnW/cQzf6yhcELbhBBICUJLKlwHBpsPL26wHjifym4z0L0GEYLN576kdroeYvD4FKEAYVr6jM6fJkDGg35W4oxOnkGfSUntK5oi7URm2hKQEkmB+/JcOcN+I55b8/swn/VUmrYOH3SWVGp4vTCjdG8fjNrUg=
- Message-id: <c52bcf980501271444351e41ca@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: Brandon Burke <thejosephboys@xxxxxxxxx>
Friends,
I am in the middle of defining fields for a database of audio (and
video) holdings. I am trying to base as many physical description
tags as I can on AACR/IASA standards but I am not sure how to handle
sound files that have been saved as data on a DVD-R.
For instance:
* a DVD would usually be a "videodisc" but the contents in this case
are audio files.
* the contents, despite being audio files, are saved as data--in other
words, one cannot simply pop the disc into a player and hear the
matreial. So do they qualify as "audio"?
I'm inclined to call it a "videodisc" simply because the carrier is a
DVD, regardless of the contents. Details as to the disc's contents
can be fleshed out in an open text field such as "Summary" or "Notes".
I should also mention that, since this is a database and not a MARC
record, I'd prefer not to have exceptionaly long phys description
chains a la "1 sound tape reel (20 min.) : analog, 15ips, stereo, 1/4"
tape."
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Thanks as always,
Brandon Burke
--
Brandon Burke
Audiovisual Specialist
Hoover Institution Archives
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-6010
voice: 650.724.9711
fax: 650.725.3445
email: burke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx