Re: [ARSCLIST] Copyright wrongs: we can't let the music industry suits stifle creativity

[David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There's definitely a great irony in the fact that I've received two "out of office
auto replies" to this note I sent, and both of them are from EMI....in light of the
copyright difficulties between EMI (Capitol in the US) and Naxos.

dl


> I'm glad to hear there's some outrage somewhere. Is anyone at least considering
> whether extended copyrights would apply only to new or current recordings or
> those made after a certain date, or whether everything would now be covered for
> 95 years including all those recordings now in the PD (in which case, I'd
> better look for a new job)?
>
> dl
>
> Dick Spottswood wrote:
>
> >
> > This is as  eloquent a statement as I've seen.   Am I wrong, or has there
> > been more outrage generated in Europe than here?
> >
> > Sonny Bonehead
> >
>                                              Subject:        Copyright wrongs:
>                                      we can't let the music industry suits
>                                      stifle creativity
> >
> >
> > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1072-1657575,00.html
> > [Image]