Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
From: kyle barnett <ksbarnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:25:13 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <6.2.1.2.2.20050917182902.04b68450@mail.78rpm.com>
Message-id: <p04310101bf5271a37f47@[192.168.2.7]>
References: <BAY106-F2843CB5E6CE5FE8DD16AF0CA900@phx.gbl> <p04310100bf5246852dd8@[192.168.2.7]> <6.2.1.2.2.20050917182902.04b68450@mail.78rpm.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Kurt,

Sure -- But my remembrance of Sousa's famous anti-phonograph article was a statement against phonography writ large, apart from its adoption into the home.

Have you seen the article by Sousa?

Kurt & Diane Nauck

c/o Nauck's Vintage Records
22004 Sherrod Ln.
Spring, TX  77389

Website: www.78rpm.com
E-Mail: nauck@xxxxxxxxx

Phone: (281) 288-7826
Fax: (425) 930-6862

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Metal Parts
  - From: Doug Pomeroy
- Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
  - From: kyle barnett
- Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
  - From: Kurt Nauck

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] articles against the "domesticated" phonograph

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]