[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ARSCLIST] Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes
- To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [ARSCLIST] Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD Longevity (was Vinegar syndrome audio tapes
- From: Frank Strauss <frank.strauss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:42:16 -0500
- Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
- Message-id: <43D28E98.1070405@verizon.net>
- Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Hi Tom-I am a long time lurker on this list, trying to learn what I can,
and have been very interested in this thread. I have put about 500 cd's
into iTunes, using mp3 format at 196 kbs. I love music, and have always
thought I had reasonably good ears. I am disturbed to think that with
iTunes(and by this, I probably mean any compressed format) you have
vastly inferior audio quality. It is probably my aging ears, but I have
trouble telling which is the original cd and which is the iTunes mp3.
Are you or others on this list able to listen to both formats without
knowing which is which, and tell the difference? (As in the test in
Grand Central Station, NYC, where they had live behind one curtain and
AR speakers behind the other) Thanks, FBS