Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:58:53 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.0.20060221012834.03cdbce0@comcast.net>
Message-id: <f4048c0e3876677195aa99b3b7c795b5@mac.com>
References: <20060221055630.139E7C6F812@mail44-res.bigfish.com> <43FAAE94.8090705@nj.rr.com> <7.0.1.0.0.20060221012834.03cdbce0@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Precisely my point originally, though I waffled a bit in my response...

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Feb 20, 2006, at 10:30 PM, Dave Bradley wrote:

That is just not true. See my previous e-mail explaining why processing in 24-bit when you start with a 16-bit sample and end with a 16-bit output file WILL give you benefit!

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Jeffrey Kane
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Bob Conrad
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
  - From: Dave Bradley

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] pottery barn
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] White haze on older LPs -- cure??
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Cassette obsolescence - digitizing standards

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]