[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] 6500-year-old voices



rodbrown wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Why so skep-tickle? All the computer would have to do would be to
> toss out all the information in the grooves having to do with the
> texture of the clay. That said, their algorithm does need tweaking.
> The sound clip is still too "muddy."
>
> (sorry!)
>
> Rod

I was there, and I'm here to tell ya, that pot ain't six thousand years old. No
more than about seven hundred fifty.

--The Two-Thousand-Year-Old Man


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]