Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui

[Steven Smolian <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>]

I used to do ths, using gold discs.  Today, in the U.S., we're down to MAM 
and MAM.

Steve Smolian

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Prentice, Will" <Will.Prentice@xxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 7:38 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui


Even if the TY discs come out as comprehensively superior, it makes good
sense to burn onto two discs with two distinct manufacturing
backgrounds. Disc manufacturers change their formulations as and when
they see fit, and keep these changes to themselves. If one company
suddenly begins using, say, a dye formulation that fails after a couple
of years, then you have the copies on the other set as a potential
failsafe. At that stage you may not care if the initial results, however
comprehensive, were less impressive :)

Regards

Will Prentice


-----Original Message-----
From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
[mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ganesh.Irelan@xxxxxxxx
Sent: 25 April 2006 23:13
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ARSCLIST] TY vs Mitsui

Here's a question for those who use cd-r for preservation.

I have used Taiyo Yuden and Mitsui for the last 8 years.  In that time
TY has always come out of my burners with much better quality as
demonstrated by a Clover Systems analyzer.  My question is, if TY has a
consistently better error rate than Mitsui, is there any reason for me
to use Mitsui at all?  I know the arguments for and against
phthalocyanine.  What do you all say?

Leaning towards TY exclusively,
Kevin Irelan

**************************************************************************

Experience the British Library online at www.bl.uk

Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. 
www.bl.uk/adoptabook

The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled

**************************************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the 
postmaster@xxxxx : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or 
copied without the sender's consent.

The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the 
author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The 
British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the 
author.

**************************************************************************


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.6/324 - Release Date: 4/25/2006