Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
From: Lou Judson <loujudson@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:44:39 -0700
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <20060616195358.mx54f52fgoz4s8g4@www.chicagoaudio.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <b5a964ee8daef21dbe21237af432c736@mac.com>
References: <C0B8B043.2128F%parker@masterdigital.com> <7411916166ceb67af6dd1cff54172712@mac.com> <20060616195358.mx54f52fgoz4s8g4@www.chicagoaudio.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

Would it do any good even now? Any 3M manufacturers in this discussion? Yeah right.

Lou Judson • Intuitive Audio
415-883-2689

On Jun 16, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Scott D. Smith wrote:

Back when we were still using tape for film production sound recording and studio work, I would always cut off the batch number tab and stick it to the inside of the box, just so that we would have a reference when there was a problem (and there were problems!).

Of course 100 years from now when someone goes back to open these boxes I don't know if it will do them much good...

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
  - From: Parker Dinkins
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
  - From: Lou Judson
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
  - From: Scott D. Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Ampex 456

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]