[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Stereo records.



I recall the mastering...and remastering of "Organs of New York Vol I" that Bob Ludwig did for me. While I could track the original test pressing on my Technics SL-1100A and Stanton 681 EEE cartridge, the organist couldn't track it on her turntable. Sadly, I had made a mistake of giving her a Shure M55 (IIRC) ... the operative word is giving...

She was incensed that (a) I gave her something inferior and (b) that it wouldn't track HER record we actually cancelled the project at one point and I sent money back to pre-paid orders. It finally came out, but it was my last LP. Two tracks from it have been re-released on a Priory Records CD.

Anyway, from then on, I used ORTF recording rather than widely spaced omnis which sounded better...

Cheers,

Richard

At 12:04 PM 6/17/2006, Scott Phillips wrote:
I was around Criteria Studios in Miami in the -80's as chief maintenance
engineer. I recall that our disk mastering consoles did have variable
low end 'crossovers' that could be set to combine to mono at whatever
frequency you wanted. It was never used on tapes made in our studio, but
outside tapes sometimes did because of poor recording/mixing engineering
or phase shift from inexpensive mixers in the record process. If you
didn't watch out, you'd cut a master that had low end that either
couldn't be tracked by a consumer grade turntable, or wouldn't allow you
to cut at decent levels or playing time.
I agree, mixing/mastering without a scope around is not a good idea, and
even back in the '-70's' every recording studio and mastering room I was
involved with used one at virtually all times.

Richard L. Hess email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Aurora, Ontario, Canada (905) 713 6733 1-877-TAPE-FIX
Detailed contact information: http://www.richardhess.com/tape/contact.htm
Quality tape transfers -- even from hard-to-play tapes.



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]