[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury co-founder Irving Green passes



Good luck selling that idea to for-profit companies who OWN the recordings by all laws of (almost) all lands, and paid money out of pocket to make them. Perhaps a good idealistic idea, but not practical in a capitalist world. And, given the history of alternative worlds, I'll take the capitalist one, warts and all.

This does bring up an interesting thing I've noticed on this list. Collectors seem to have vague or "different" ideas of ownership. Just because one WANTS something to be available does not mean that's OK with those who own it. It may not be OK for logical reasons (ie no market except a handful of vocal collectors -- but this problem may disappear with online distribution, for instance the number of obscure songs available at iTunes) or for illogical reasons (giant megaglomerate doesn't understand its own vaults or has misplaced masters, etc). But, point is, in an ownership society (which had definitely proven superior over time), the owner of something has the final call. Whether the desirer/potential customer likes it or not.

Now, what I would like to see is a more reasonable copyright system. One idea I've had is, perhaps 35-40 years exclusive copyright on something with perhaps up to 15 years renewal if it remains in print throughout the whole period. If, during the copyright period, something is out of print 5 years or more, another party may pay a royalty and have access to a reasonable facsimile of the master for reissue. I'd even support up-front reissue-rights payment with a smaller royalty paid on each item sold, which would protect copyright owners from fly-by-nights and people with big ideas but small wallets and little common sense. Under this system, it would be in the copyright owner's interest to provide a good quality version to the 3rd party so as to maintain the value of their product even if they themselves don't have it in print for one reason or another. Under this system, no matter what, after that 15 year extension -- max -- the content goes into PD. Big copyright owners will say that doesn't give them enough time to amortize risks, but I say they take few risks these days anyway. This would apply to music, books, movies and other copyright items (including software and games). Now I'll duck as the tomatos fly!

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Cox" <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury co-founder Irving Green passes



On 07/07/06, Tom Fine wrote:
You are correct. There were probably 50 more CD's that could have been
done (perhaps more if one considered being completist on the mono
stuff, which was an unlikely track because there was specific and
limited interest in the pre-1956 catalog and that interest was
addressed with the handful of mono reissues). Universal decided to
discontinue the reissues in 2000 after scaling back the previous two
releases. Many of the titles are still in print in the US but seem to
be taken out of print in most other markets, which is pretty idiotic
since they sold extremely well in the Orient and Europe. A good
classical issue is like an annuity -- keep it in print and it will
keep sending checks to the home office.

While there are probably some on this list who are passionate about
small-group and chamber music, in Mercury's case it never sold as well
as the orchestral and band recordings, so it was considered at the
bottom of the pile for reissues. Solo and concerto stuff like Janos
Starker and Byron Janis were big sellers originally and were big
sellers on CD. Point is, the reissue was a commercial undertaking (and
was very profitable), so what was reissued and in what order was
considered very carefully.

It seems to me it is time some of the classic recordings (in all genres) were recognised as cultural treasures, so that reissues like these could be subsidised by UNESCO, the big Foundations, or Governments in various countries, just as art galleries and opera houses are subsidised.

While there may sometimes be a profit to be made from reissues, often
there is not. Or only enough to support a one-man-and-dog record company,
with consequent poor distribution.

There are many recordings that should be permanently available to all,
in the highest possible engineering quality, for the same reason that
anyone can walk into the National Gallery and look at the pictures.

Regards
--
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]