[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] .BWF implementation
At 10:46 AM -0400 8/12/06, Steven Smolian wrote:
What we really need is a template that includes the minimal
information and than can be added to a program, perhaps through the
normal outboard loading system, Direct X and the like, which would
give manufacturers some idea of this minimal size.
not sure, but i'd say plugin protocols don't allow direct access to
file-writing functions. when a plugin developer kit is constructed
by a workstation company, they are limited very carefully to what
they can do, i.e., what the plugin-writers will be allowed to do.
most of the time they are limited to a "service window" where they
get data, do their math, and hand it back. the app has to do file
accessing.
Sony: stands for Soon Only Not Yet. according to people inside who'd
be booted if they said it out loud.
sony will get there, if there's a market for sound forge into the EBU market.
--
w/best regards,
seva
mastering engineer
http://www.soundcurrent.com
|| | | | | | | |
Things are not what they seem to be; nor are they otherwise.
-- Lankavatara Sutra