Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
From: Don Cox <doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 18:43:28 +0000
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussi <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <s4fd3c47.028@gwia203.syr.edu>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <yam10474.1400.155607512@smtp.ntlworld.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

On 05/09/06, Robert Hodge wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Paper prints were generated and deposited at the Library Of Congress
> as a means of copyright registration.
> 
> The medium never saw projection in any form.   

The Edison paper prints have been available on the Library of Congress
web site for several years, as moving image files for download.

Try here:
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/edhtml/edmvhm.html

Regards
-- 
Don Cox
doncox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
  - From: Robert Hodge

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Underscore in file names
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Paper cuts * going all -digital still not popular [Re: Preservation ]

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]