[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] Of Discographic Interest
On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, steven c wrote:
> As I see it, the function of ARSC should be to define (and possibly suggest
> details of) the "core fields" of both catalog and discographic databases.
> As well, "optional" fields could also be approached (these are fields which
> wouldn't necessarily be used by every database compiler).
I would agree that the depth of the cataloged entry should be a variable.
Would this seem like a worthwhile project for ARSC?
Karl