[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] FLAC?



On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, David Seubert wrote:

> I came away convinced that FLAC is
> inappropriate for archival use.
snip
> Second, there is no guarantee that FLAC will be around in six months or
> two years.

Perhaps someone could comment on the history of WAV and thoughts about how
long it might remain with us.

Karl


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]