My understanding is that the NAVCC (when fully up and running at full  capacity) will in fact be 
significantly larger then other  repositories that you mention. This was mentioned in passing by 
several vendors who responded to the RFC for the acquisition of the  storage subsystem. I do not 
know personally if that is true, but the  vendors responding were the players who would have been 
in a position  to know that kind of information and I have no reason to doubt them.  The 
repository for NAVCC is however very specialized due to the  mission - and there are many things 
to look at with repositories on  the scale that we are discussing - access for example is an 
important  area. Some repositories may be smaller in terms of the amount of TB's  stored, but may 
have very large bandwidth requirements due to the  access requirements. Others may be much larger 
but could essentially  be "dark" archives which collect information but have it only  accessed 
infrequently - so which is "bigger" depends very much on how  you define your terms.
An article on the NAVCC is located here.
http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/06078/navcc.html
Jim Lindner
Email: jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Media Matters LLC.
  SAMMA Systems LLC.
  450 West 31st Street 4th Floor
  New York, N.Y. 10001
eFax (646) 349-4475
Mobile: (917) 945-2662
Office: (212) 268-5528
www.media-matters.net
Media Matters LLC. is a technical consultancy specializing in  archival audio and video material. 
We provide advice and analysis, to  media archives that apply the beneficial advances in 
technology to  collection management.
www.sammasystems.com
SAMMA Systems provides tools and products that implement and optimize  the advances in modern 
technology with established media preservation  and access practices.
On Dec 13, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Mike Richter wrote:
Jim Lindner wrote:
This is a very interesting post, just one very quick comment. I  have been a consultant for the 
Library of Congress for about 5  years now - and I can tell  you for sure - absolutely - that 
those  quotations of space are just - well - silly. Since the library  does not even have a full 
accounting of exactly how large the  collection is - and because it grows every minute 
(literally)  these "estimates" really have absolutely no basis in fact. The  Libraries 
collection includes many more types of objects then  books. And even if you just consider the 
books - they are in many  different languages - and what about the pictures in the books?  There 
are illuminated manuscripts. In the National Audio Visual  Conservation Center being built in 
Culpeper Virginia, the estimate  is that many terabytes a day will be generated in the transfer 
of  analog carriers.
Once upon a time, I had clearance to ask what the traffic and  storage numbers were for NSA. 
Since I never asked, I may speculate  that it would make the LoC's efforts pale in comparison
Mike
--
mrichter@xxxxxxx
http://www.mrichter.com/