Also note that GE/NBC has cracked down on YouTube. Pretty soon, it
will be back to being what it started out as -- a bunch of boring junk
from kids with video cameras. The copyright owners will want to
distribute video for pay or for free on their own websites. And
YouTube's inventors will turn out to be the cleverist of the dot-bomb
zillionaires for selling at just the right time for maximum
hype-dollars (although that title may forever belong to Mark Cuban,
who invented a now-dead audio site and sold it for megabux to Yahoo
when they panic'd about Real Networks stealing the whole streaming
audio show; now Cuban is a loud and obnoxious basketball team owner).
By the way, I have been impressed and pleased by the growth of video
podcasts available free via iTunes. Most of the Sunday political talk
shows are now available either as audio or either video or audio
podcasts. I believe that eventually network TV shows will go this way
-- have a podcast available with commercials for free during perhaps a
2-week period surrounding the original broadcast and then have the
episode available without commercials for a couple of bucks forever
afterward. When that happens, it'll sure put the last nail in the
coffin of most VHS decks and probably kill off TiVo too.
-- Tom Fine
----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcos Sueiro" <mls2137@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst
Bert,
I don't think it makes a difference. If the audio is under copyright,
it is illegal to post it. I believe you are also required to state
the copyright owners.
This is a related article from this week:
Viacom wants its clips removed from YouTube
Associated Press
Published February 3, 2007
NEW YORK -- Media company Viacom Inc., which owns the cable networks
MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon and the Paramount Pictures movie studio, asked
YouTube on Friday to remove more than 100,000 unauthorized clips from
its hugely popular video-sharing site.
Viacom said in a statement that after several months of talks with
YouTube and its corporate parent, the online search leader Google
Inc., "it has become clear that YouTube is unwilling to come to a
fair market agreement that would make Viacom content available to
YouTube users."
Viacom said that YouTube and Google had failed to deliver on several
"filtering tools" to control unauthorized video from appearing on the
immensely popular site.
The company was now asking YouTube to take the clips down, but
stopped short of filing a lawsuit.
Under federal copyright law, online services such as YouTube are
generally immune from liability as long as it responds to takedown
requests such as these, which YouTube often does. Less clear legally
is what happens when another user posts the same video, something
commonly done on the free video-sharing site.
YouTube said in a statement that it would comply with the request
from Viacom and said it cooperates "with all copyright holders to
identify and promptly remove infringing content as soon as we are
officially notified."
The company also said it was "unfortunate that Viacom will no longer
be able to benefit from YouTube's passionate audience which has
helped to promote many of Viacom's shows."
In November, YouTube agreed to delete nearly 30,000 files after the
Japan Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers
complained of copyright infringement.
Some media companies such as CBS Corp. and General Electric Co.'s NBC
Universal have made deals to allow YouTube to use video clips from
their programming, but others have yet to agree with the site over
ways of being compensated for the use of their copyrighted material.
Universal Music Group, a division of French telecommunications giant
Vivendi SA, had threatened to sue YouTube for copyright infringement,
saying it was a hub for pirated music videos, but later reached a
licensing deal with them last year.
Despite Viacom's problems with YouTube, the company's MTV Networks
division reached a licensing deal last year with Google that allows
the search company's video service to use clips from MTV and its
sibling networks under a revenue-sharing agreement.
Bertram Lyons wrote:
Does the fact that this is a home video alter the issues of
copyright? If he were to do the same thing (i.e. digitize his 78
collection) and publish it online as an audio database with full
sound files (instead of home video), would he be under any sort of
copyright violation with the particular labels and songwriters
associated with said recordings?
Just curious -
Bertram
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ARSCLIST] Some YouTube stuff that may be of interst
From: Roger and Allison Kulp <thorenstd124@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, February 02, 2007 10:06 pm
To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=78MAN&page=1
I will admit the guy has a lousy player,and some of his records
aren't the best shape.
I have a better condition "Move It !" 78 myself,but it is interesting,
Roger
"If you're not on somebody's watchlist,you're not doing your job"
Dave Von Kleist
---------------------------------
Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with theYahoo!
Search weather shortcut.