I agree with Parker, Richard and Tom. You really don't want your precious tapes looking like this - http://www.cupsnstrings.com/xSites/Agents/cupsnstrings/Content/UploadedFiles /Ugly%20Tape.jpg
The client said "some tape came off the reel"! It took 86 hours to get this 1/4 inch analog tape back on to a 10.5 inch reel. Proper packaging is paramount!
Cheers
Marie
Marie O'Connell
Sound Archivist/Audio Engineer/Sound Consultant
3017 Nebraska Avenue
Santa Monica, CA, 90404
Ph: 310-453-1615
Fax: 310-453-1715
Mobile: 601-329-6911
www.cupsnstrings.com
-----Original Message----- From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List [mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Parker Dinkins Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:27 PM To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Transporting 10 inch pancakes
on 2/6/07 3:59 PM US/Central, Jerry McBride at jerry.mcbride@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Does anyone have experience with moving a collection of quarter-inch tapes, as ten-inch pancakes in their original boxes? It seems logical to assume that it would be safer to ship or move tape on reels. How great is the danger that the pancake will come unwound under normal shipping and moving conditions if stored on hubs in the original boxes?
AES Standard for audio preservation and restoration- Magnetic tape - Care and handling practices for extended usage (AES49-2005):
4.5.5 Flangeless hubs
Sometimes magnetic tape is stored on flangeless hubs. When this practice is used, the following recommendations shall be observed:
a) Only backcoated tape designed for storage on a flangeless hub shall be stored in this manner. Non-backcoated tape will not wind properly and is at high risk of falling off the tape pack.
<snip>
In the past week I've received and repaired two broken tape packs which were stored on flangeless hubs.
One of these was backcoated tape which didn't travel via common carrier at
all. The other was non-backcoated and packed tightly with a styrofoam tape
spacer.