Re: [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto
From: Karl Miller <karl.miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:21:18 -0800
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <45EC4D1A.7080901@sympatico.ca>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <633756.66515.qm@web81602.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

I wonder if anyone has turned up a positive review of a "Hatto" recording when the same critic might have been less than generous reviewing the same recording when it was sold under the name of the person who actually performed.
   
  Karl
David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  I will try not to gloat over the fact that a certain idiot record producer is 
among the ones taken in by these fakes. A discography is at the end of this 
article..they stole from everybody! Telarc, EMI, Bis, London, Naxos, CBC..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joyce_Hatto

dl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto
  - From: joe@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto
  - From: David Lennick

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] The case for message boards.
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] The case for message boards.
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Joyce Hatto

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]