Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
From: David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:31:12 -0400
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <934615.26547.qm@web81604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <46EAB750.8030304@sympatico.ca>
References: <934615.26547.qm@web81604.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.13 (Windows/20070809)

Interesting..so they changed the numbers after the lacquers had been cut. MG 50000 most definitely has 10100 in the land. 50001 has 10101 in the land and 50001 faintly scratched in.

dl

Karl Miller wrote:

MG 10100 was Brahms Piano Quartet No.3 with Horszowski Karl

David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Were Mercury MG 50000 and 50101 ever actually released as 10100 and 10101? Both have the lower catalog numbers on the labels (in parentheses) and in the dead wax, but I've never seen them as other than Olympian Series.

Kubelik/Chicago Symphony, Pix at an Ex and Bartok/Bloch respectively.

dl

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
  - From: Roger and Allison Kulp

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
  - From: Karl Miller

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Mercury Olympians

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]