Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
From: Tyrone Settlemier <talk78s.settlemier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:39:31 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <00ed01c840a9$df86c020$210110ac@DISCOGRAPHY>
References: <cfd.23cdd1e2.349361e1@aol.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

By the way, thanks all! Not only did I discover which title is correct, I found the source of my error Just out of curiosity, when RCA issued pre-1949 recordings on 45rpm, why didn't they just use the original 78rpm catalog numbers, but with the 47-prefix? Any particular reason? They did so going forward.

Tyrone

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
  - From: Steven C. Barr(x)
- Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
  - From: Dick Spottswood

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
  - From: Cary Ginell

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] Newsletter correction - San Jose Airport code
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] RCA Victor 20-2765

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]