Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
From: Parker Dinkins <parker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 16:22:53 -0600
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <4782AD6B.23753.37B6090@pattac.image.dk>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <C3A8025D.2DE67%parker@masterdigital.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AchRe9gxFvJzgr1vEdyqFAAWy4RdmQ==
Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

on 1/7/08 3:53 PM US/Central, George Brock-Nannestad at pattac@xxxxxxxx
wrote:

> I am sorry, but neither Parker Dinkins nor Jerry Hartke have answered my
> question, which may be summarized as: what are the deviations in measurements
> on the same disc, same diagnostic system, but different placement of the CD
> on the hub. 

George, sorry, I have absolutely no idea. Improper warmup is the only reason
given for deviations in measurements, according to Stagetech (in fact the
test results will flag an improper warmup).

--
Parker Dinkins
MasterDigital Corporation
Audio Restoration + CD Mastering
http://masterdigital.com

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
  - From: George Brock-Nannestad

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] CD-R error rates

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]