Re: [ARSCLIST] Dyna....

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dyna....
From: David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:09:16 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <20080316.130337.8567.1@webmail04.dca.untd.com>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <47DD7E6C.3070608@sympatico.ca>
References: <20080316.130337.8567.1@webmail04.dca.untd.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210)

Incidentally, Canadian pressings in the early 70s never got as thin as the US floppies. Too bad Canada was importing virtually all of its Red Seals at that point.

dl

spcv1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Dynagroove was a step down(or a falling down the steps) from the LSC days, but Dynaflex has to rate right up there with the Edsel as one of the biggest "bombs" of all time. They may have looked good on paper, but actuality certainly turned out something altogether different. SS

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Exactly how many labels did RCA press records for in the 50s/60s ?
Next by Date: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Philips U.S. releases in the ...
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Exactly how many labels did RCA press records for in the 50s/60s ?
Next by thread: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Fwd: [ARSCLIST] Philips U.S. releases in the ...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Dyna....

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]