Re: [ARSCLIST] Columbia Records monthly supplements

[David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah so! I get some lists by e-mail and some by print, and by and large I much 
prefer to have the print version. Easier to peruse at leisure and in a variety 
of locales, easier to consult when checking the invoices and the leftover 
lists. Electronic auction lists save me a lot of money, on the other hand, 
since I find the a pain to navigate and just look at labels or names that jump 
out at me.

dl

Tom Fine wrote:
> I got this Hawthorne auction list I speak of via e-mail, in PDF format, 
> per the Hawthorne e-mail to this list a couple days ago. The book I 
> speak of was in the middle pages of the PDF. I deleted the whole thing 
> or I'd send it around. Some interesting stuff but I'm holding my wallet 
> in these days of $4+ gasoline.
>
> -- Tom Fine
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Lennick" <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Columbia Records monthly supplements
>
>
> > I'm looking at the last Hawthorn auction (#122) and I don't see 
> > anything like this in either of the sections devoted to print. And the 
> > newest auction hasn't left the printer yet, according to Virginia.
> >
> > There WERE some Columbia supplements in #122, but from 1915-16.
> >
> > By the way, "The Label" is the biggest crock I've read about the 
> > phonograph industry. The guy had access to so much wonderful 
> > information, Goddard Lieberson's private diaries et al, and manages to 
> > make dozens of mistakes on every page, all of which could have been 
> > caught.
> >
> > dl
> >
> > Tom Fine wrote:
> > > I think this one was different. Get a copy of Hawthorne's auction, 
> > > it's in the middle of the listing.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Smolian" <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:09 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Columbia Records monthly supplements
> > >
> > >
> > > > If this is "The Label," it goes through Columbia's history through the
> > > > purchase by Sony.  I just finished it.  It's a fun read but somewhat 
> > > > quirky.
> > > > But it has none of the data I'm searching for.
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
> > > > [mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Fine
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:55 AM
> > > > To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Columbia Records monthly supplements
> > > >
> > > > Hi Steve:
> > > >
> > > > I don't know if this will help but the latest auction from Hawthorne 
> > > > Antique
> > > > includes a book about
> > > > Columbia history from the beginning to the mid-50's if I remember 
> > > > correctly.
> > > > Perhaps that has some
> > > > of the info you seek in these monthly bits?
> > > >
> > > > -- Tom Fine
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Smolian" 
> > > > <smolians@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:30 AM
> > > > Subject: [ARSCLIST] Columbia Records monthly supplements
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm interested in buying Columbia monthy supplements from the 
> > > > 1948-period
> > > > on.  That includes 78 and
> > > > LP.
> > > >
> > > > I can also use Coda, the consuer house organ and other such 
> > > > materials that
> > > > show monthly releases.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not looking for magazine ads or annual catalogs.
> > > >
> > > > Anything out there?
> > > >
> > > > Steve Smolian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > L