[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ARSCLIST] RIAA EQ software
I'm also with Tom. I get best results from decoding in analog prior to ADC.
Although "declickling" can be a lot easier when the transfer is done flat
(sans RIAA de-emphasis). Nevertheless, the SNR into the ADC is far from
optimal when presented with such a skewed slope (as "flat" is definitely not
flat). Also, I even tried the SonicStudio HD RIAA curve (which operates
with Andy Moorer's filter in a 48 bit engine) but the outcome was too dark.
It didn't sound right. Better was actually using an unrecapped, 80's era
NAD receiver and chasing that with a Prism MEA-2 eq to correct for the
slight discrepancy between a pink track on the Cardas/Ricker lp and true
"flat" response. If you use a Disc washing system with vacuum you will get
a much cleaner transfer in the first place which will require much less
declickling. So, I think that vinyl works best with analog transfer
equipment. Ymmv.
Andrew
On 8/25/08 8:12 AM, "Mike Hirst" <mike.hirst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm with Tom on this one. Analogue Eq every time. I've got a WBE Diamond 36
>
> http://www.wbe-audio.de/english/produkte/vorverst/diamond36.htm
>
> and I wouldn't trust anything else.
>
> Tom Fine wrote:
>> DC6 and DC7 have a variety of phono-EQ built in as pre-sets for the DSP EQ.
>>
>> I'm a very big fan of doing phono EQ in the analog domain. Sorry, I just
>> don't trust DSP enough. I can say for sure that I much prefer my phono
>> preamp (made by Audio Design Associates, and I also prefer my homebrew
>> Marantz 7 phono stage) to the DC6 DSP and also a hand-made EQ curve in
>> SoundForge. Given all the talk we've had about bit-mangling in just the
>> recording phase, do you really trust most DSP for a radical EQ like a
>> compensation curve? If you're getting good results with digital, bully
>> for you, but I recommend you try a good preamplifier matched properly to
>> your cartridge and then LISTEN to the two versions and see which you
>> really like better.
>>
>> One man's opinions, etc.
>>
>> -- Tom Fine
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Olhsson" <olh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 1:13 AM
>> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] RIAA EQ software
>>
>>
>>> I know of nothing free however the de-emphasis presets that Michael
>>> Gerzon
>>> created as part of the WAVES Q-10 equalizer plug-in are extremely
>>> accurate.
>>>
>>> Bob Olhsson Audio Mastery, Nashville TN
>>> Mastering, Audio for Picture, Mix Evaluation and Quality Control
>>> Over 40 years making people sound better than they ever imagined!
>>> 615.385.8051 http://www.hyperback.com http://www.thewombforums.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List
>>> [mailto:ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Phillips
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:56 PM
>>> To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [ARSCLIST] RIAA EQ software
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any suggestions for software to apply the RIAA EQ curve
>>> to a file from a disk transfer ? I have Soundforge 9, and figure I could
>>> dial up the approximate curve, but is there anything specific out there
>>> ? Free is always nice, but not a requirement.
>>>
>>> Scott Phillips
>>>
>>
>>
--