Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer transfer

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer transfer
From: Matt Sohn <mahatma57@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:31:59 -0600
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <59CAFFD5993147D2BE473F5663FE5062@PORGIE>
References: <20081120114705.b192746a6fddb703927f95bcf5fd261f.7c1f430a07.wbe@email.secureserver.net>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

I recall Malcolm Chisolm telling me that a certain type of dry cleaning fluid worked well for wet playback. I forget if it was Trichloroethane or Carbon Tetrachloride, but he also told me that the stuff was extremely toxic and had been banned for home use. I do not recommend trying it.

-Matt Sohn

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer transfer
  - From: Michael Biel

Prev by Date: [ARSCLIST] Looking for LTO Help
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Looking for LTO Help
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer transfer
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer transfer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] lacquer transfer

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]