[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] My "CD-based" gripe--was: ARSC Awards -- Award criteria (was: Awards 2009 - Call for Nominations)



Seems to me the sort of thing that an XML-based record interchange format would be good at. Comma separated tables work well until the first time someone changes the table schema by adding a new data field. With a series of commonly tagged records, additional fields don't impact backward compatibility. Then, it would be relatively simple to develop Javascript/PHP scripts for basic reading and HTML formatted display of the data (say for a built-in reader on a CD/DVD distribution) without any more specialized or license restricted software. At the same time, such a fomat would also facilitate more advanced manipulation or the importation of data into other databases. Grep, awk, and perl would, of course, still be options for those of us who want it.

The first step here then is agreeing on a format and base set of attributes.

Daniel G. Epstein (mobile)

On Nov 23, 2008, at 23:11, David Breneman <david_breneman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

--- On Sun, 11/23/08, Steven C. Barr <stevenc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

IF digital "publication" was in the form of
database file(s), the data
contained within could be easily and quickly searched
and/or re-sorted by the users!


OK, which databse should we standardize on? Oracle? MySQL?
Something in between?

Now, if we're talking about providing data in a .csv file that
can be imported into any database, or even a spreadsheet, or
even better, accessed via grep, then that's something useful.






[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]