Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:18:13 -1000
From: Malcolm Rockwell <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Robert Johnson RPM debate
James -
I've read the arguments and heard the pitch shifted samples and say
it's
possible the recordings are pitched high. This would mean one of three
things: 1) Robert really sang that way; 2) the material was
recorded too
slow; and/or 3) the final pitch was modified by dubbing prior to
manufacture.
I tend to go with #1, mostly because I've always heard him the way he
has been presented on LPs and CDs and my ear is used to that. The
samples are interesting food for thought, though!
#2 is possible mostly because machines do run slow (there's very
little
homogenity of 78rpm recording speeds company to company, and
session to
session within the same company. Add that to playback speed variations
and, well...). What was the power source in Dallas? 110 VAC? 120
VAC? Or
was it DC voltage? If AC, was the frequency (usually 60 Hz) solid, or
did it wander? What kind of motor did the portable recording lathe
use... AC, DC or counter-weighted (mechanical)? There are just too
many
variables here.
#3 requires forethought and since there was seemingly so little of
it in
#2, I doubt this scenario. Producers are not going to agonize about
this
kind of thing; to them Robert was just another blues picker. But who
knew what he'd become 60 years later or that any of this would matter?
Good luck with your research!
Mal Rockwell
*******
james mendenhall wrote:
Hi, Arsclist
I am doing research about the rpm debate of the Robert Johnson
recordings.
Does anyone have any information for me?
And, is this all speculation or has there been proof found that they
are indeed too fast?
thanks
james