From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad
----- point taken as regards batch processing on the reel. I was thinking of
the peeling situation and the use of a Copeland-style "grandfather clock"
approach to baking. Baking in a tunnel oven, so to speak. In that case,
having the affected part outermost and at a large radius of curvature might
make sense.
>
> As to the ethics of what is being done, I was assuming that despite
> leader and taking splices apart that Eric is assembling a tight A-B
> roll IN THE DIGITAL DOMAIN AS I WOULD DO (OR BACK IN THE ANALOG
DOMAIN AS WILL POINTED OUT
and having similar if not-identical crossfades in the final,
> delivered file. The concept here -- and it (THE STEPS TAKEN)
certainly needs to be CAREFULLY
> noted -- The digital surrogate matches the original in the
> condition originally found to the best of our ability. The
> original was disassembled in order to obtain the best possible
> digital copy and THE ORIGINAL RE-ASSEMBLED to facilitate re-play
IN THE FUTURE with the ANTICIPATED needed REprocessing.
----- is there a verb missing here, and in that case, what is it, and where
is it to go? It would have an influence on the statement. And we still have
to imagine scenarios for when anybody would want to access the "original"
again.