Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations
From: Roderic G Stephens <savecal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:58:05 -0700
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <592827.32417.qm@web83501.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>

When I was working in the studios, I think they used three-phase systems  (and still do?) to handle more power and operate a bit more smoothly when interlocking all those 35mm dubbers.

Rod Stephens

--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Danger <danger@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Danger <danger@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations
> To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 5:32 PM
> I was always amazed by selsyn (sp?)
> motors and later biphase motors on dubbers and watching the
> dubber men slip tracks as well as tracks being dubbed
> backward. I am sure others remember this is 21 channel sound
> records.
>

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Recording Innovations

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]