[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PADG:1980] Role of PARS Discussion Group Survey
- To: <padg@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PADG:1980] Role of PARS Discussion Group Survey
- From: "Melissa McAfee" <mcafee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:02:37 -0500
- Message-id: <002801c2f7d1$3e203980$b301a8c0@WORKGROUP>
If you would like to contribute to the Policy, Planning, and Research
Committee’s survey on the role of Discussion Groups, there is still time
to do so. Completed surveys can be returned to Melissa
McAfee or Bobbie
Pilette until <st1:date Month="4" Day="11"
Year="2003">April 11, 2003. Our contact information is listed at the
end of this message. Many thanks, for your assistance!
<font size=3
face="Times New Roman">
The Policy, Planning, and Research Committee is
reviewing the role of the Preservation and Reformatting Section’s eleven
Discussion Groups. The primary purpose of the DGs is
to support a forum for discussion on various preservation topics.<span
>
We’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on the effectiveness
of the DGs.
If you could take a few minutes and fill out and return this brief
survey along with any comments it would be very much appreciated.
Should <span
>PARS<span
> continue to support the following DGs?
<table class=MsoTableGrid border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
>
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">DISCUSSION GROUP
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">YES
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">NO
<span
><font
color=black>Binding Automation<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
>Cooperative
Preservation Programs<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Library Binding<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
>Micropublishers<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
>PARS<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Photographic and Recording Media<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Physical Quality and Treatment of Library Materials<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Preservation Administration<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><font
color=black>Preservation Instruction, Education and Outreach<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><font
color=black>Small to Mid-sized Preservation Program Discussion Group<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
class=SpellE>Reformating<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
For DGs you feel should not be supported,
would a Special Interest Group be better? Information on Interest Groups is
available at: <a
href="">http://www.ala.org/alcts/alcts_news/news/news_igfaq.html
<span
>
yes_____ no____
If yes, which of the DGs would be
better as a SIG:
<span
>
______________________________________________________.
Should any of the DGs be combined?<span
> yes_____ no____
If yes, which DGs should be combined:
_________________________________
Additional comments or suggestions:
Many thanks, in advance for your assistance. Please send your comments
by <span
>April 11, 2003<span
> to:
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">Bobbie<font
size=2> <span
>Pilette<font
size=2>
Head, Preservation Department
<span
>Yale<span
> <span
>University<font
size=2> Libraries
roberta.pilette@xxxxxxxx
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">tel<font
size=2>: 203 432 1714
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">Melissa<font
size=2> <span
>McAfee<font
size=2>
Director, Research <span
>Library<span
>
<span
>New York<span
> <span
>State<font
size=2> Historical Association
mcafee@xxxxxxxxx
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">tel<font
size=2>: 607 547 1473