[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PADG:2318] rationale for reprographics centers
- To: Preservation Administration Discussion Group <padg@xxxxxxx>, MICROLINK-L@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [PADG:2318] rationale for reprographics centers
- From: Andrew Hart <ashart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:33:41 -0500
- Message-id: <4050CD25.4070009@email.unc.edu>
- Reply-to: padg@xxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
I am very interested in hearing from anyone who has made a decision in
recent years to create, continue, or close a microfilming operation
based in a research library. For those who have closed a lab, what were
your principal reasons? Any regrets? For those who have opened or
continued operations in an existing lab, how is the lab funded?
Completely dependent on revenue? If subsidized by the library, to what
extent?
I am also interested in how others are handling patron-requested
photocopies in special collections. Do you have a centralized
reprographics service? If so, is it in the preservation department?
What roles do staff in special collections play in filling requests?
As you could easily guess, I am reviewing the state and future of our
lab at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. I appreciate any
comments regarding labs in peer libraries, in as much or little detail
as you are able to share.
Thanks,
Andy
This message is posted to both PADG-L and MICROLINK-L. I apologize for
duplication.
--
==================================================
Andrew Hart, Preservation Librarian
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CB#3910, Davis Library
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
tel: (919) 962-8047
fax: (919) 962-4450
email: ashart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
==================================================