[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[padg] RE: RE: [tfoe] Fw: [alacro-l] ALA Urges Congress To Correct Law That Inadvertently Targets Libraries, Publishers



Title: [District Dispatch] ALA Urges Congress To Correct Law That Inadvertently Targets Libraries, Publishers

CPSIA covers both lead--as in some printing inks--and the phthalates that might be present in plastic covers, plastic bags used to keep kits together, and "realia" in those cases where libraries have circulating toy collections.

 

The latest from ALA's Washington Office is:

 

Children’s Books and the CPSIA” – STANDBY - Situation “Fluid” -Forward to everyone

 

In August 2008 the 110th Congress passed the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) to protect children under 12 from exposure to lead following widespread reports about the dangers of children’s toys coming in the U.S. from China and other places.  This new law is administered by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and will likely start to take effect in February 2009 (although even this latter date appears to be changing.)

 

Within the last few days, ALA and others in the “book” community (other librarians, publishers, teachers, booksellers, etc.) became extremely concerned after seeing that the CPSC intended to include books in the definition of “products to children” that would need to be certified as safe.  This concern was heightened by a letter from the General Counsel of the CPSC – a letter that states that books are not exempt from the law.

 

However, ALA has been in discussion with attorneys, other associations and the sponsors of the original bill.  Our analysis is that neither the law nor the legislative history indicates any Congressional intention to include books and even textbooks in the law. 

 

Please stand by – there is no need to take action at this time.  The situation is extremely fluid and every day this week ALA has received new and sometimes contradictory information.  The ALA Washington Office is taking measures to ensure this ruling (CPSIA) will not affect libraries and has sent a letter to all Congressional offices alerting them to the fact that we believe CPSC General Counsel has erroneously interpreted the CPSIA to include books. ALA is also monitoring the potential impact on other types of library materials as well.

 

Several key Hill offices have contacted the CPSC Commissioners and the General Counsel.  We believe that the misunderstanding may be cleared up, so the Commission can focus on children’s products that are truly dangerous.

 

If we can’t get this resolved, we will need everyone who wants children to continue to have access to safe children’s books to contact the Commission and Capitol Hill – but, for now, we can stand by until we hear more from our Congressional supporters.

 

 

The ALA Library is tracking developments at

http://wikis.ala.org/professionaltips/index.php/Consumer_Product_Safety_Improvement_Act_%28CPSIA%29

 

 

*If* the regulations stick, they could affect such things as a university library special collection department being able to acquire an antiquarian children's book because it is still "intended for children" even though the likelihood of it ever being touched again by a child is nil.

 

 

-- Karen Muller, MLS

   Librarian and Knowledge Management Specialist

   American Library Association

Toll free: 1-800-545-2433 x 5031

Direct: 312-280-5031

 

 

P Think Green - Not every email needs to be printed

 

 

 

From: Sanders, Douglas H [mailto:dohsande@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 8:26 AM
To: padg@xxxxxxx
Subject: [padg] RE: [tfoe] Fw: [alacro-l] ALA Urges Congress To Correct Law That Inadvertently Targets Libraries, Publishers

 

My guess is that it's more about the potential for phthalates present in plastic covers and pages rather than lead.

 

Douglas Sanders

Paper Conservator, IUB Libraries

E. Lingle Craig  Preservation Lab

851 N. Range Road

Bloomington, IN 47408

 

 

 

From: Bogus, Ian [mailto:ian.bogus@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:15 AM
To: padg@xxxxxxx
Subject: [padg] FW: [tfoe] Fw: [alacro-l] ALA Urges Congress To Correct Law That Inadvertently Targets Libraries, Publishers

 

Has anyone heard about or responded to this?

 

Ian

 

From: Jonathan Betz-Zall [mailto:jbetzzall@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:37 PM
To: tfoe@xxxxxxx
Subject: [tfoe] Fw: [alacro-l] ALA Urges Congress To Correct Law That Inadvertently Targets Libraries, Publishers

 

Does anyone have any hard information on the presence of lead in books or other library materials? We might be able to help ALA respond appropriately if we can uncover some reliable information on this topic.
Cheerio!  Jonathan

Jonathan Betz-Zall
http://ecolibrarian.org
Seattle, Washington, USA
jbetzzall@xxxxxxxxx
"Try kindness first."

--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Don Wood <dwood@xxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Don Wood <dwood@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [alacro-l] ALA Urges Congress To Correct Law That Inadvertently Targets Libraries, Publishers
To: alacro-l@xxxxxxx
Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 8:09 AM

CPSC ruling requires children’s books to be removed for safety testing

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The American Library Association (ALA) released a letter to Congress yesterday, urging members to take action against a recent opinion ruling released from the General Counsel of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) that would require public, school, academic and museum libraries to either remove all their books or ban all children under 12 from visiting the facilities, beginning on February 10.

The opinion was issued to the Association of American Publishers (AAP), following the group’s request to exclude children’s books from regulation under the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA), which passed the 110th Congress in August and is enforced by the CPSC.

Under the CPSC’s interpretation of the law, which seeks to protect children from exposure to lead and phthalate, books for children under the age of 12 are required to undergo the same testing procedures as children’s toys. Since the General Counsel’s opinion is retroactive, all books currently on library or store shelves must be removed for testing, including textbooks and children’s literature books in academic library research collections.

The publishing community has supplied the Commission with evidentiary support (available at www.rrd.com/cpsia ) that books and other non-book, paper-based printed materials should not be subject to the lead, phthalate, and applicable ASTM standards that are referenced in CPSIA because they do not present any of the health or safety risks to children that the law intended to address.

ALA President Jim Rettig said he agrees that books do not pose a threat to children and should not be subject to regulation.

“The CPSC should enforce this important legislation where the dangers are – not with books, which are not playthings and should remain unregulated,” Rettig said.

“I sincerely doubt that Congress intended to require libraries to be subject to this law, but if Congress does not act soon, libraries across the country will be forced to remove books from the shelves, rather than keep them available to serve the educational needs of our nation’s children.”

The ALA’s letter to Congress can be viewed here.



You may view the latest post at
http://www.wo.ala.org/districtdispatch/?p=1322

You received this e-mail because you asked to be notified when new updates are posted.
Best regards,
Jenni Terry
jterry@xxxxxxxxxxx

 


[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]