Re: [ARSCLIST] LP pressing question

[David Lennick <dlennick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What is the proper term for a vinyl pressing made from old stampers, usually 
for audition purposes or possibly to use as a source in reissuing? 
Theoretically, one made from an unissued master could be a test, but should 
these just be referred to as vinyls? Lots of them turn up (thousands were made 
available to a Toronto dealer a couple of years ago, all 60s or 70s pressings 
from ARC stampers, many of them unissued takes).

dl

phillip holmes wrote:
> I've been told by collectors and people that were in the business, that 
> test pressings were pressed in very low numbers, IE, 100-200 copies for 
> the musicians, A&R people, producer, big wigs, and the like.  Every test 
> pressing I've seen had a plain white label with just the bare basics 
> typed or handwritten, and I only have 2 major label test pressings and 
> 3-4 "audiophile" test pressings.  The jacket had a pasted on (typed or 
> handwritten) note with just the basics--tracks and artist stuff.  If 
> anyone wants a picture, I'll send one.  But it's impossible to confuse a 
> white label promo with a test pressing.  Obviously, the idea of the test 
> pressing is to give fair warning about what's going to be on the 
> record.  It supposedly gave the musicians the opportunity to sign off on 
> the final product, but this really was a micromanagement tool for the 
> front office types.  I can imagine some imbecile in management spitting 
> his coffee all over the board room table while listening to Black 
> Sabbath for the first time.  "Fairies wear boots?  What the hell is this 
> crap?  Who signed these bozos?  I need to fire the A&R department".
> Phillip
>
>
> >                             Roger
> >
> > Tom Fine <tflists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Why do most test 
> > pressings that I've heard sound better than a bought-in-store version 
> > of the LP? Did the plants do something special for the test pressing 
> > or use a "brewer's choice" biscuit compound or is it more a random 
> > chance of having a further-down-the-production-run copy in a store and 
> > thus worn stampers? Where I've been able to compare a master laquer to 
> > a test pressing to a bought-in-store version of the same 
> > cut/matrix/whatever, the test pressing usually sounds pretty darn 
> > close to the first cut but the production disk sounds inferior, 
> > usually lower s/n ratio and noisier surface. This was less true in the 
> > one case I've been able to compare all 3 for a modern LP reissue and I 
> > assume it's because a modern reissue that appears at retail will be 
> > pressed with more care on better vinyl and fewer copies will be made 
> > per stamper, but I might be wrong on that.
> >
> > In some older examples, late 50's and early 60's, the retail version 
> > vinyl seems to definitely be a different compound from the test 
> > pressing, which more resembles modern, "softer" quieter-playing 
> > compounds.
> >
> > -- Tom Fine
> >
> >
> >        ---------------------------------
> > Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally,  mobile search that gives answers, not web 
> > links.
> >