Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64

To: ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
From: Parker Dinkins <parker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 14:22:49 -0500
Comments: To: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@loc.gov>
In-reply-to: <BAY107-F290F5789A0C5851897A784CAC40@phx.gbl>
List-archive: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>
List-help: <http://listserv.loc.gov/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=ARSCLIST>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV?body=INFO ARSCLIST>
List-owner: <mailto:ARSCLIST-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-subscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ARSCLIST-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV>
Message-id: <C305BDB9.2B55B%parker@masterdigital.com>
Reply-to: Association for Recorded Sound Discussion List <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Acfwu0+yjgtsjVyuEdyKSwAWy4RdmQ==
Thread-topic: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.6.070618

on 9/6/07 12:37 PM US/Central, Doug Pomeroy at pomeroyaudio@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:

> I'm told the Grammy Foundation standard is 196 kHz, which at least one
> professional designer views as a huge waste of storage space.  And certainly
> overkill for spoken word recordings!

The Grammy methodology doesn't mandate that at all, it specifies a range of
24/48 through 24/192.

See 
http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Foundation/Grants/08_forms/2008_A-P_Methodology
_R3.pdf

--
Parker Dinkins
MasterDigital Corporation
Audio Restoration + CD Mastering
http://masterdigital.com

References:
- Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
  - From: Doug Pomeroy

Prev by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] wire recording tranfers
Next by Date: Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
Previous by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
Next by thread: Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Table of Contents]

Re: [ARSCLIST] BWF RF64

[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]