[Table of Contents]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ARSCLIST] Dawn of digital -- more info provided and more needed



Hi George:

Yes, like the rest of this book, driving a bit wide of the facts to make a point in prose. But I am definitely finding the book amusing. He's in spitting distance of the facts in some of the corporate things he's written about that I know anything first or second-hand. So I'd say he's definitely a critic and not a journalist but the book is not out in left field and I do agree with some if not all of his uber-points.

See my previous post about the factual history of commercial digital recording as I've been able to suss out so far. I won't write my article until I nail up all the holes, but it's getting closer.

By the way, the version of the book I got from Amazon contains all the controversial stuff about the Naxos head but there are footnotes.

-- Tom Fine

----- Original Message ----- From: "George Brock-Nannestad" <pattac@xxxxxxxx>
To: <ARSCLIST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Dawn of digital -- more info provided and more needed



From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad

Hello,

Tom Fine is doing a fine job of researching the sources for digital recording
(althought the distribution format was converted to analog for LP). I thought
I would add a bit that has not been aired on this list yet, after quoting
Tom:


Virgil Fox "The Digital Fox" was made from Soundstream test recordings made at the same time as the Crystal Clear direct-to-disk recordings made in 1977. I don't count it as the first U.S. commercial digital recording because those Soundstream tapes were a test recording and the recording's intended and original release medium was direct-to-disk (the digital version was released a couple of years later). I do count the 3M digital recording of the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra as an early but probably not the first U.S. commercial digital recording because the 3M tapes ended up being used as the master for the LP due to malfunction of the direct-to-disk recording. This information from one of the engineers and one of the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra people present at the recording. The LP jacket is confusing because it is flagged "direct to disc" but mentions the 3M digital system in the credits.


Norman Lebrecht in his recent book "Maestros, Masterpieces and Madness. The Secret Life and Shameful Death of the Classical Record Industry", Allen Lane, London 2007 has a discussion of "100 Milestones of the Recorded Century". On page 238 (of the unexpurgated version; Tom Fine on the AESCH-list has pointed out that this book is to be withdrawn and revised due to a court case filed by NAXOS) Lebrecht writes regarding the TELARC recording of Gustav Holst: Wind Suites with the Cleveland Symphonic Winds/Frederic Fennell [4-5 April 1978]:

"Two Clevelanders, Jack Renner and Robert Woods, asked to borrow it [i.e. the
Soundstream machine invented by Thomas Stockham] for their first professional
recording and then had the affrontery to to ask the professor to adapt it to
their needs. Stockham cheerfully obliged and the device was tried out on the
reeds, brass, and percussion sections of the Cleveland orchestra. ..........
The Cleveland musicians played with silky smoothness and the dynamic span
from soft to loud was delicately calibrated, astonishing ears that had grown
used to LP compression. This was the first digital release on LP, an amuse-
gueule for what was about to be served up. Reviewers marvelled at the
reduction of hiss and crackle and manufacturers cracked ahead with digital
research."

So it seems that this recording would fulfill all criteria of intention, but
obviously I am not certain about claims of priority.

Kind regards,

George



[Subject index] [Index for current month] [Table of Contents]