[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Oiling winds
- Subject: Re: Oiling winds
- From: Jim McGill <jim@elseware.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 1994 21:34:20 +0200 (MET DST)
- Message-ID: <606321967D7@nrm.se>
Dana's answer to the general question of the why of oiling, was very
informative. Thank you, Dana, for such detail. Given one should oil (which
I never really questioned), my concern becomes polymerizing vs.
nonpolymerizing oils. Polymerizing oils wet the wood, absorb into the
grain, and, presumibly, modify the surface characteristics beyond the
obvious effects of waterproofing and gluing down stray grain fuzz.
Nonpolymerizing oils also absorb into the surface, providing waterproofing,
but add no glueing beyond that caused by surface tension and continue to
move as they cannot be immobilized. I have no basis for choosing between
them, though my bias is for polymerizing oils as they form a better looking
surface. Have conservators that have old winds in their keeping seen long
term results of the two types of oils that can give me a rational basis for
choosing, or has mineral oil been around too short a period for it's
consequences to be known?
Jim McGill