[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PADG:1970] Role of PARS Discussion Groups
- To: <padg@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PADG:1970] Role of PARS Discussion Groups
- From: "Melissa McAfee" <mcafee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:47:36 -0500
- Message-id: <000501c2efc1$3279b9c0$e101a8c0@WORKGROUP>
The Policy, Planning, and Research Committee is reviewing the role of
the Preservation and Reformatting Section’s eleven Discussion Groups. The
primary purpose of the DGs is to support a forum for
discussion on various preservation topics.
We’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on the effectiveness
of the DGs. If
you could take a few minutes and fill out and return this brief survey along
with any comments it would be very much appreciated.
Should <span
>PARS<span
> continue to support the following DGs?
<table class=MsoTableGrid border=1 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0
>
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">DISCUSSION GROUP
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">YES
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">NO
<span
><font
color=black>Binding Automation<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
>Cooperative
Preservation Programs
<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Library Binding<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
>Micropublishers<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
>PARS<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Photographic and Recording Media<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Physical Quality and Treatment of Library Materials<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><font
color=black>Preservation Administration<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><font
color=black>Preservation Instruction, Education and Outreach<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><font
color=black>Small to Mid-sized Preservation Program Discussion Group<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
<span
><a
href=""><span
class=SpellE>Reformating<span
>
<span
>
<span
>
For DGs you feel should not be supported,
would a Special Interest Group be better?
yes_____ no___<span
class=GramE>_ If yes, which of
the DGs would be better as a SIG:
______________________________________________________.
Should any of the DGs be combined?<span
> yes_____ no____
If yes, which DGs should be combined: ________________________________<span
class=GramE>_
Additional comments or suggestions:
Many thanks, in advance for your assistance! Please send your comments
by April 11, 2003 to:
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">Bobbie<font
size=2> <span
>Pilette<font
size=2>
Head, Preservation Department
<span
>Yale<span
> <span
>University<font
size=2> Libraries
roberta.pilette@xxxxxxxx
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">tel<font
size=2>: 203 432 1714
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">Melissa<font
size=2> <span
>McAfee<font
size=2>
Director, Research <span
>Library<span
>
<span
>New York<span
> <span
>State<font
size=2> Historical Association
mcafee@xxxxxxxxx
<font size=2
face="Times New Roman">tel<font
size=2>: 607 547 1473<font size=2
face=Arial>
______________________________________<span
>
Melissa McAfee<span
>
Research <st1:PersonName
><font
size=2 face=Arial>Library<span
> Director<span
>
<span
>New York<font
size=2 face=Arial> <span
>State<font
size=2 face=Arial> Historical Association
The Farmers' Museum<span
>
PO Box <font
size=2 face=Arial>800<span
> <span
>Lake Road<span
>
<span
>Cooperstown<font
size=2 face=Arial>, <span
>NY<font
size=2 face=Arial> <span
>13326<span
>
607 547 1473 (tel)<span
>
607 547 1405 (fax)