[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PADG:925] using the Trusted Digital Repository Model (responses)
- To: padg@xxxxxxx
- Subject: [PADG:925] using the Trusted Digital Repository Model (responses)
- From: "S. Lamson" <salamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:29:36 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: "A. Lally" <alally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0603231025370.18294@homer23.u.washington.edu>
- Reply-to: padg@xxxxxxx
Hi all,
Below is a list of those institutions who replied to our query some time ago
re: who is planning around the TDR model. With the exception of OCLC's Digital
Archive Service (implemented around the TDR model), committees at the
institutions below were either recommending the use of the TDR model as a
planning document or using it as a self-audit:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
University of Michigan
North Carolina State University
University of Oregon
OCLC's Digital Archive Service
Of course, this list is very likely incomplete given that it's missing some
institutions quite involved in digital preservation.
Many thanks to all those who replied and shared their thoughts,
Stephanie and Ann
_______________________
Stephanie Lamson
Assistant Preservation Librarian
and
Ann Lally
Head, Digital Initiatives
University of Washington Libraries
______________________________________
Earlier message:
For some committee work at the UW Libraries, we are interested in creating
a list of institutions currently planning around the Trusted Digital
Repository model (http://www.rlg.org/en/pdfs/repositories.pdf) and thought
it would be helpful to poll the PADG and DLF mailing lists. We would
appreciate your input and will summarize the info for the lists.
Many thanks,
Stephanie & Ann