[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PADG:1150] Re: PARS--why it works the way it does
- To: "Steve Dalton" <dalton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PADG:1150] Re: PARS--why it works the way it does
- From: rdecandido@xxxxxxxx (rdecandido)
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 10:03:05 -0800
- Message-id: <002EA4DB.C21343@nypl.org>
I absolutely agree with Lorraine and Steve that we don't want
to fix something till it's broke. But I do think that we need
to start factoring in electronic participation (of which this
is a good example).
Can (should) there be effective electronic Discussion Group
exchanges between conferences?
Could such exchanges be organized in ways similar to DG
meetings?
Could they come up with action ideas to bring to the parent
committee?
Could they replace in-a-room meetings?
ALA Council just approved (provisionally) using chat software
for Association business. They were thinking of it for unit
meetings but it might work very well for DG's.
It seems to me that one or two of the DG's could could
experiment with trying to carry on discussion by list or chat
or some other means and use some of their face-to-face time to
evaluate the experience.
Bob DeCandido